The Debauched is not Guilty, it is the Debaucher

By Ursula Haverbeck

    Is there such a thing as a popular government without a people?  In principle no, but German officials try to do exactly that at this time.  German people still have a choice to vote for a political party.  However, their interests are actually contradicted by the government.  This applies particularly to the issue of immigration.  The majority of people are of a totally different opinion than their representatives.  These people are not trying to change our people’s behavior.  It is rather the effort of the government to change the people biologically.

    Laws have been enacted to criminalize anyone who wishes to maintain the ethnic purity of German folks.  At first Germans experienced this mindset when faced with the enemies of exploitative Capitalism and Communism.  It has in reality become an officially sanctioned dogma that has succeeded in embedding itself in the thinking of many Germans.

    The anti-German ideas were first introduced into conversation with a specific goal in mind.  Then scientists supported these ideas and some people began to agree.  Small political parties began to voice opposition to immigration and were faced with stiff penalties by the government.  People with ideas as to racial purity were discounted and even prosecuted in the courts.  Young folks decided to voice their opinions and in reaction to their ineffectiveness politically many became violent.  The young folks are frustrated with being unable to express themselves.  The government has reacted by doling out harsh prison sentences, of which we read daily.

    The media issues statements relating behavior of people as similar to that of dogs:  “No dog is violent by nature.  They only do what they have been taught.”  It is said that it is not a matter of exterminating the dog, but rather to keep it under control and even muzzle it in order to control the animal.  Supposedly it is all up to the dog’s owner.  So goes the argument between animal rights activists and dog owners.

    There is usually not a proposition of declaring that a child is inherently evil.  The conventional wisdom amongst psychologists, sociologists and even prison wardens is that the educational environment makes the difference.  Of course, there are exceptions in the cases of both dogs and children.

    It is clear that violence and crime are rapidly rising.  If such a fact is related to left- or right-wing politics then the theory has an overlap.  It is quite clear that some folks will question the society.  It is then proposed to raise meek and non-violent children.  No dog develops normally if it is constantly beaten.  A child can also not develop normally if it is stamped as the child and grandchild of criminals and must thus continually suffer from such a stigma by paying reparations.  Mental terrorism acts in exactly the same way as do beatings.

    The courts and teachers are in actually the dominant influences on the children and are in effect the creators of this violence.  They give children a bad example in mendacity, corruption, and immorality.

    In what way is the love of truth and respect and the pursuit of a healthy education to be awakened for these young people?  Is television, with its orgies of violence to do this?  Are the parents, who are both consumed with making money, to be looked to as an example?  Are the schools, which at the very best provide a little bit of knowledge, going to help out?  It is in schools that violence breaks out quite often.  If the values of society are to be examined, then the idea comes clearly forth that life is worthless.  If someone risks everything, then it is only for the sake of a thrill and he is called an extremist.  Many throw their lives away racing motor vehicles, with drug use, having sex orgies, or being violent towards others, especially those who are quite different from them.  The society is constantly being filled with more foreign people with different languages, customs, and religions which Germans can not understand.  The aliens are constantly threatening us.  The youth are unconsciously driven to despair and anger in a life without meaning except to see the ever-present stranger.

    Every scientific study has noticed exactly these phenomena in societies whose leaders push for more foreigners.  Rather than admit the fault in the policy of bringing in the foreigners it is proposed to punish the young more harshly when they attack the aliens.  Drug offenses, manslaughter, and murder are treated much more leniently than offenses to the foreigners, which leads to a troubled situation.  The society is ultimately responsible for creating a worthless situation.

    “No dog is inherently evil.  Everyone’s will is that as it is made through education.”   Such is the official policy.  Questions as to by whom or how our children are made malicious and violent are never asked.  The official policy is now being tested.

 

       This article was taken from kehrusker.net with permission and translated by Duncan Edmister.